A “STARTER” LIST OF ISSUES FOR COMMENT ON THE NWMO’S PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Note: this list is not exhaustive, read other comments for more ideas; in making your comments reserve the right to make additional comments, noting that the 30-Day comment period was insufficient for a full review.

There was not enough information provided on the following topics:

Long-Term safety.

Transportation

Emergency response and evacuation plans

Accidents

Malevolent acts / Security

Health (discussed under “socio-economic”)

Worker and Occupational Health (not addressed)

Project Steps

  • Transportation
  • Use fuel packaging plant (lacks a complete or even summary description)
  • Concurrent placement of wastes in underground chambers while construction is ongoing
  • Monitoring through operational, closure and post closure stages

Climate considerations and estimates of climate impacts

Potential effects section is inadequate

Radioactivity and estimates of radioactive releases from various project activities over various time frames and assessing those effects (largely just ignored)

Community profiles: differential treatment, transportation and downstream communities largely excluded

Sequencing of the approvals/licenses

Water “management” omits key issues, including:

  • pumping of groundwater from the underground (volumes, contamination, storage, treatment, release)
  • Water from the used fuel packaging plant (volumes, contamination, storage, treatment, release)

Alternatives to the project (e.g. continued on-site storage) are not describeed

Alternative means (of carrying out the project) description is inadequate or missing; examples include:

  • Ramps versus shafts
  • Transportation in used fuel containers instead of in transportation containers
  • Mining methods, for example to minimize Excavation Damage Zones (versus standard mining techniques)
  • Repository layout
  • Waste emplacement (in room vs infloor)
  • Used fuel container design

The project description states that access (to the site) will be limited; no details are provided, including:

  • Will Tower Road and Dyment Road (currently used extensively by the public) be gated or decommissioned?
  • Will the canoe route through the area be blocked or restricted?
  • Will hunting and fishing and foraging in the area be disallowed? If so, for what area?