In-Depth: Nuclear Waste and Health

There are no safe doses of radiation. Decades of research show clearly that the risk of harm increases with even small doses of radiation. Health risks include the risk of cancer, but also of other immune-related disorders, such as increasing allergies, asthma and even harmful effects on unborn children.

Radiation from nuclear materials is called  “ionizing radiation”.

Ionizing radiation (radiation that can remove electrons from atoms/molecules) is a powerful thing. In controlled amounts, it is used with care in medical diagnostics and therapies. Outside the medical arena, however, such radiation can be a deadly hazard to health. On acute exposure, ionizing radiation can cause “radiation sickness”, and lower exposures can have long-term detrimental health effects, including cancer.

Here’s an illustration showing non-ionizing and ionizing radiation in the context of radiation one is exposed to, day-to-day:

More information on ionizing radiation at Polimaster: https://en.polimaster.com/resources/radiation-basics/types-of-ionizing-radiation

The radioactive elements (isotopes) present in nuclear waste emit ionizing radiation.

There are over 200 different radioactive isotopes created in a nuclear reactor.  Understanding how these radioactive materials behave involves two important factors: each isotope has a “half-life”, and each isotope “decays” into another radioactive isotope.

Half-life: in radioactivity, the half-life is the interval of time required for one-half of the atomic nuclei of a radioactive sample to decay (change spontaneously into other nuclear species by emitting particles and energy).

Decay: When a radionuclide decays, it transforms into a different atom – a decay product. The atoms keep transforming to new decay products until they reach a stable state and are no longer radioactive.

For example, one isotope present in nuclear fuel waste is water-soluble Cesium-137, which releases gamma radiation. If ingested, Cesium-137 travels to the internal organs – especially the reproductive organs. The elements in the waste that emit this radiation undergo “decay” over various periods, transforming into new elements. Cesium-137 has a half-life of 30 years, meaning that its radioactivity will wane considerably in the next 300 years.

Another example is Strontium-90, which has a similar half-life, and is known to move to the bones and soft tissue if it makes its way into the human body.

Other radioactive elements in used nuclear fuel waste, such as Plutonium-239, have half-lives of tens of thousands of years – some, hundreds of thousands. Plutonium-239 is one of the two fissile materials used for the production of nuclear weapons. If inhaled, even in microscopic quantities, Plutonium-239 can cause serious and even fatal damage to the lungs.

ionizing radiation and health graphic
Source: The Nuclear Fix: A Guide to Nuclear Activities in the Third World, by Thijs de la Court, Deborah Pick, & Daniel Nordquist, page 8, World Information Service on Energy (WISE), The Netherlands, 1982

How will residents of Northern Ontario be exposed to radiation by this project?

During the tens of thousands of shipments of radioactive waste, people along the route will be subject to “routine” levels of radiation. The doses are expected to be low, but there is no safe level of exposure to radiation.  If a transportation accident resulted in releases from the containers, the levels of exposure could be very high.

At the project site, the wastes will be repackaged, resulting in additional “routine” exposures. Also, fans will bring air from the underground repository to the surface, and this air is expected also to include low levels of radiation.

To date, the NWMO has not provided communities under investigation with estimates of the level of exposure from these sources. In the longer term, if and when containers fail, it is expected that radioactive materials will eventually make their way to surface. The timeline for these releases is  uncertain, but the NWMO has no plans for long-term monitoring and there are no known means of reversing the release of radioactive materials from a deep geological repository, if and when the release are detected.

Links to reliable sources for more information

Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation Report VII (commonly referred to as “BEIR VII”).

Related report: “Atomic Radiation is More Harmful to Women,” summarizing findings of the National Academy of Science’s landmark Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation Report VII, and was published by the Nuclear Information Resource Service in 2011. Very readable.

Radiation and Health page on Know Nuclear Waste website – contains a wealth of information and links to reliable data.