Comment by May 10th on Draft Guidelines for NWMO’s Impact Statement

| The Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s massive project to transport and bury all of Canada’s high-level nuclear fuel waste in northwestern Ontario has moved to the next stage of a federal review with April 10th’s launch of a second 30-day comment period – this one on what information must be included in the multi-year review process. The deadline for comments is Sunday, May 10th. |
From April 10 to May 10, the Impact Assessment Agency is inviting comments from the public and Indigenous people on Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (there is also a summary version), a Public Participation Plan, and an Indigenous Engagement and Partnership Plan. The purpose of Guidelines is to set out what information the Nuclear Waste Management Organization must provide in their Impact Statement and supporting documents, which will form the basis of the impact assessment process and public hearing.
How do I submit comments?
You can use the online “portal” on the Impact Assessment Agency web site (step-by-step instructions are provided HERE) or you can send your comments by email to nuclearwaste-dechetsnucleaires@iaac-aeic.gc.ca
FAQs about the Impact Assessment process
The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) is planning to transport an estimated 140,000 tonnes of highly radioactive nuclear fuel waste to the Revell site in northwestern Ontario where it will be processed (repackaged) and placed in a deep geological repository. Transportation will take place over 50 years, with 2-3 trucks per day traveling an average of 1,800 km from the current location at nuclear generating stations. The wastes will be placed in a series of caverns and tunnels blasted out of rock approximately 800 metres below the surface. There is no long-term plan for monitoring the waste containers after they are placed in the underground chambers.
The Nuclear Waste Management Organization is a consortium of the provincial power companies who own and operate nuclear reactors to produce electricity. Ontario Power Generation is the largest and is responsible for more than 90% of the wastes, with smaller volumes generated and owned by Hydro Quebec and New Brunswick Power. The NWMO was formed in 2002 after the Nuclear Fuel Waste Act came into effect. The NWMO is the proponent of the Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project.
An impact assessment process is a multi-step review to evaluate the environmental, health, social, and economic impacts of major projects before they proceed. The process considers public and Indigenous input, scientific data, and traditional knowledge to determine if a project is in the public interest.
An impact assessment process is a multi-step process. During the first “planning” phase an initial description of the project which has been prepared by the proponent is reviewed and guidelines are developed that set out what information the proponent must include in their Impact Statement. During the next phase the proponent develops their Impact Statement, which is a detailed description of their project and proposed activities and how they might impact the environment or human health. During the third phase an impact assessment is carried out, based on the Impact Statement and including a public hearing. The fourth phase is the “decision phase” when the hearing panel reports to the federal government and the government decides on whether the project can go ahead, or under what conditions it can proceed.
Nuclear projects are licenced by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, so an impact assessment and a review of the first of a series of CNSC license are carried out at the same time in an “integrated” or joint review.
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) is an agency of the Government of Canada responsible for federal environmental assessment process of major projects and administering the Impact Assessment Act.
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) is the regulator for the use of nuclear energy and nuclear materials. They administer the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA), which governs the development, production, and use of nuclear energy and substances to protect health, safety, security, and the environment and numerous regulations under the NSCA, covering licensing, security, and transportation.
The federal impact assessment process began on January 5, 2026. It is a multi-year process, and a schedule has not been published, but the planning phase is expected to conclude by June 2026. In the next phase the NWMO will develop their Impact Statement. A public hearing is expected in 2028 or 2029 with a decision by the federal government in 2029 or 2030.
There are several licencing steps spread over several decades. The “Licence to Prepare the Site” will be issued in the same general time frame as the impact assessment decision. The Licence to Construct will be a few years later, and the Licence to Operate a few to several years after that. The license to close the site will not be applied for until operations are completed (the NWMO is describing this as a 160-year project). The Licence to Abandon the site is the last licence.
There are two 30-day comment periods during the “planning phase”. The first, commenting on the Initial Project Description, was between January 5 and February 4, 2026. The second is on the “draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines” (the guidelines) and commence on April 10 and will close on May 10. In future phases, the public will be invited to comment on the hearing panel’s terms of reference and to review the NWMO’s Impact Statement and then participate in a public hearing, including submitting reports, speaking to the panel, and posing questions.
FAQs about the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines
In an Impact Assessment the guidelines outline the information requirements that must be provided in an Impact Statement.
The “Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines” (the “guidelines”) outline the required studies, scope, and information that the proponent – in this case the NWMO – must provide so the project’s potential environmental, health, social, and economic impacts can be assessed. They also direct the proponent to describe how they have evaluated cumulative effects, considered Indigenous knowledge, and incorporated mitigation measures.
An Impact Statement is the information provided by the proponent in order for the Review Panel to assess the potential effects of the project. It is the information base provided by the proponent for the public review and the public hearing.
The guidelines are important because they will determine what information the proponent must present in the Impact Statement and supporting documents, which will then form the basis of the assessment process, including the public hearing.
You can comment on the draft guidelines by providing your comments in writing to the Impact Assessment Agency during the comment period either by email or by posting them through a link on the Agency’s web site. To find the public registry for this project go to canada.ca/iaac and key “deep geological repository” or “dgr” into the registry search (click on the green button near the top of the page). When on the project page you can submit comments directly to the public registry by clicking on the “Submit a Comment” button (left side, 2/3rd down the web page). The email for the project review is nuclearwaste-dechetsnucleaires@iaac-aeic.gc.ca
After the comment period the Impact Assessment Agency will finalize and post the guidelines. At the same or similar time, a “Notice of Commencement” will be issued, which starts the next phase of the Impact Assessment Process.
See this quick explainer video for details:
Read We the Nuclear Free North’s April E-Newsletter HERE, with an update regarding the Impact Assessment next steps.
Check out the public comments already posted!
The number of comments continues to grow, even between comment periods. Below is a sampling of comments on the NWMO’s Initial Project Description, from the first comment period from Jan. 5, to Feb. 4, 2026:
We the Nuclear Free North (submitted by Canadian Environmental Law Assoc.)
We the Nuclear Free North
Northwatch
Environment North (submitted by Legal Advocates for Nature’s Defence)
Melgund Township Local Services Board
Nearby Tourist camp operator
Eagle Lake First Nation (detailed)
Manitoba Energy Justice Coalition
Assembly of First Nations (report)
Town of Kapuskasing
Local Resident (Borups Corners)
Biigtigong Nishnaabeg
Eagle Lake First Nation
Comment on Transportation
Quick Links
KEY FACTS
A federal review of the Nuclear Waste Management Organization’s (NWMO) “Adaptive Phased Management Project” is underway.
The NWMO’s plan is to transport, process and bury all of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste at a site between Ignace and Dryden in northwestern Ontario. The project will include 50 years of transporting highly radioactive waste with average transportation distances of 1,800 km per trip (1,700 from Ontario reactors). The 160 years of operation will place 150,000 tonnes of the radioactive waste underground in the headwaters of the Wabigoon River watersheds.
NWMO has selected a site between Ignace and Dryden in northwestern Ontario, in the heart of Treaty 3 territory. The NWMO has deemed only Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation and the Township of Ignace to be “host communities”.The Township of Ignace is 45 km east of the site and in a different watershed; there are other communities closer by and hundreds of communities along the transportation route and downstream from the site who the NWMO has not included in their decision to select the Revell site.
The NWMO describes the Revell site as being “in the territory of Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation” but there are several other Treaty 3 Nations who are also in relationship with the land NWMO has selected. Treaty 3 Chiefs in Assembly have expressed their opposition, as have Nishnawbi Aski Nation, Anishnabek Nation and Chiefs of Ontario.
The NWMO project will generate radioactive releases at each stage, from transportation to when the wastes are eventually abandoned underground.
There is no operating deep geological repository (DGR) for high-level nuclear waste anywhere in the world; there are projects in Finland and Sweden under development, but no DGR has received final approval or begun to operate.
The NWMO excluded transportation from its Initial Project Description, proposing that transportation issues not be part of the federal review. The Impact Assessment Agency, in its April 10 Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (a document to guide the NWMO in what it must include when it composes its Impact Statement) directed that off-site (i.e. public highway, and rail) transport of the nuclear fuel waste was within the scope of the assessment and must be examined. WTNFN volunteers are currently assessing the draft Guidelines.
Additional Tips for commenting :
- If using the IAAC online portal, fill in your name in the “name” field, but do not fill in the “organization” field unless you are authoried to represent that organization. You may indicate your support of an organization in the body of your comment.
- You may comment more than once if you wish. In the second comment period, the most effective comments will refer to specific aspects of Agency’s Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and/or refer to the basis of your interest (community member, live along the transportation route, environmental concerns, etc.) – but you may also simply indicate your approval or disapproval of the NWMO project.
We the Nuclear Free North will continue sharing news, analysis and updates. Check here again soon, or email nuclearfreenorth@gmail.com to be added to our e-news list and receive regular updates.

Three more “one minute actions” you can take today:
1. If you haven’t yet, send an email to the Impact Assessment Agency asking to be added to their email list for notices regarding their review of NWMO’s nuclear waste project. Once on the list, you will receive email communications regarding all upcoming stages and comment periods. Make your email brief, simply asking to be added to the list. The email address is nuclearwaste-dechetsnucleaires@iaac-aeic.gc.ca . Note that commenting during comment periods does not automatically add you to the list.
2. Use We the Nuclear Free North‘s online “action tool” to send a pre-made email to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources. The link is: https://win.newmode.net/wethenuclearfreenorth/nuclearwastetransportationitsanimpact. Truly, it takes less than a minute!
3. Use We the Nuclear Free North‘s online “action tool” to send a pre-made email to your Member of Parliament. The link is: https://win.newmode.net/wethenuclearfreenorth/nuclearwastetransportationitsanimpact-1. Again, less than a minute!
And then, if you have a few more minutes – write a letter or four!
- Email Prime Minister Carney at pm@pm.gc.ca
- Email the Honourable Julie Dabrusin, Minister of the Environment and Climate Change at ministre-minister@ec.gc.ca and/or julie.dabrusin@parl.gc.ca
- Email the Honourable Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources at NRCan.Minister-Ministre.RNCan@canada.ca and/or tim.hodgson@parl.gc.ca
- Email your Member of Parliament. You can find their email address at https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
We the Nuclear Free North continues to support informed public discussion and criticism of the NWMO’s plan to transport, process, bury and abandon all of Canada’s nuclear fuel waste at the Revell site in the heart of Treaty 3 territory in northwestern Ontario.
For updates in your Inbox:
If you have not already, sign-up for our contact list to receive news and analysis throughout the review process (including this “trial balloon” being rolled out by NWMO).
